"Ayodhya verdict is finally out (Ah!!!! what a relief)....... All the parties got 1/3rd of the land.... good job NCP, you really twisted the jurisdiction arm well.... But we ask you (future managers, generation next, hope of our country), does it or rather should it really affect us. Do we really care whether a temple is build or a mosque? How does this decision effect you and me?"
Answer should be within the limit of 350 words. Send you opinions before 17th October, 23:59:59, and give your voice a platform at iOpine.
A lot has been said written and spoken and a lot of hype has been created on this issue of Ayodhya, which has moved on from becoming a political issue from where it started and gained momentum to being a national issue between religious groups of sort. How ever the verdict was much awaited since the matter went in to the court 17 years ago, this has not only created a lot of inquisitiveness among people who are connected with the issues directly per say but also the mass which was not quite informed about it as it is now. It all started with the breaking down of the temple by Babar as historians say and build the Babri masjid,followed by the priest of the Hindu religion putting an idol of Rama in 1947 followed by the FIR launched by a muslim against it so far no one knew who did it , then the rally and to demolish the mazjid and the issue moved to the court in the presense of BJP leaders like LK ADVANI AND MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI. Since it was out and out a political move to capture the Hindu religious sentiments by BJP then called Bhartiya Jan Sangh. This has moved me as a citizen of the republic of India since being an educated individual education tells me of not creating a divide between people based on the religious views. The issue has touched the common man and his security in some way and is related to his religious view point though the people may not be related directly whether the temple or the mosque is built as we are a secular nation !!! But are we really secular in true sense ?? As an individual perception i believe it would not quite matter to people what is built on the disputed land of Ayodhya as they are provoked by political and religious groups towards the issue, then to educate people about what actually happened ?? One thing bothers me if for almost 400 years no issue was created why now ??? There are 3 lakh functional mosques in India compared to any Islamic country. After much procrastination the supreme court asked the Allahabad high court to give an order and they did and gave everyone a piece of land equally, i believe it was not much of a legal solution given by the court , as the issue is now awaited for verdict from the supreme court after 3 months after being moved there. I feel the verdict of 1/3 rd is a wise one as everyone's interest is being fulfilled they get to build their religious temples is secular and
ReplyDeletemaintains the equal status of both the relegion, the dispute is due to the land given to Nirmohi Akhada. The only purpose of stretching the issue is to gain political mileage and except playing with the religious sentiments of people. Since it being sensitive in a country like India,it might lead to communal disharmony which would serve as a vote bank for political parties.I hope better sense prevails and the verdict by Supreme court resolves the issue amicably and peace remains. Since people would not be affected by verdict but politicians,religious leaders would surely try to cash on it,which is a pain for the citizens to see the issue its consequence when we call ourselves constitutionally secular as a country and be proud of it.
The relief to all citizens of India by verdict of Ayodhya on 30th September, 2010 after hype created by media, long waited and duly delayed from Ayodhya High court because this was considered as most critical event after partition. The verdict has finally refuted all the future implication (especially negative) generated by political pundits and Indian media by showing the maturity in honouring the judgement and accepts the fact on birth place of Lord Rama. The above acts by all citizens are directly (externally) or indirectly (internally) affect us by proving the positive image to world media because there were much been said about citizens of India in the past.
ReplyDeletePeople of India have started thinking on “being responsible Indian” first and then about being specific to any religion because this type of incidents has already spread the negative vibes in rest of the world’s perception. Here, we can’t change their perception but we can show our integrity in appropriate moments like honouring Ayodhya verdict, formation of Unique Identity (UID), successfully managing the CWG event in grand scale, showing unity in Australia where our students are getting attacked. These all and many other incidents has generated the fresh air and positive vibes in apprehensive mindsets of world critic. Actually, this all affect or relate directly to us when we are working in MNC firm or in out of the India like many software techies in Silicon Valley. Just think of you are in group of managers which are from other countries in a firm and occurring of such events enable other group member to think negative or apprehensive about you. They will not think how good you are as a person and professional in past or which position you are in or education you are having. Sometimes the business owned by you in foreign country also gets affected by this negative image.
Indian top firms are keen on buying the land or acquiring the business in foreign. Here, the positive image of India and their citizens are getting transformed to the firm and country as whole. Posotive image comes out.